The hydrogen-chlorine bond in HCl or the hydrogen-oxygen bonds in water are typical. If B is a lot more electronegative than A, then the electron pair is dragged right over to B's end of the bond.
To all intents and purposes, A has lost control of its electron, and B has complete control over both electrons. Ions have been formed. The bond is then an ionic bond rather than a covalent bond. The implication of all this is that there is no clear-cut division between covalent and ionic bonds. In a pure covalent bond, the electrons are held on average exactly half way between the atoms.
In a polar bond, the electrons have been dragged slightly towards one end. How far does this dragging have to go before the bond counts as ionic? There is no real answer to that. Sodium chloride is typically considered an ionic solid, but even here the sodium has not completely lost control of its electron. Because of the properties of sodium chloride, however, we tend to count it as if it were purely ionic.
Lithium iodide, on the other hand, would be described as being "ionic with some covalent character". In this case, the pair of electrons has not moved entirely over to the iodine end of the bond. Lithium iodide, for example, dissolves in organic solvents like ethanol - not something which ionic substances normally do.
In a simple diatomic molecule like HCl, if the bond is polar, then the whole molecule is polar. What about more complicated molecules? Consider CCl 4 , left panel in figure above , which as a molecule is not polar - in the sense that it doesn't have an end or a side which is slightly negative and one which is slightly positive.
The whole of the outside of the molecule is somewhat negative, but there is no overall separation of charge from top to bottom, or from left to right. In contrast, CHCl 3 is a polar molecule right panel in figure above.
The hydrogen at the top of the molecule is less electronegative than carbon and so is slightly positive. This means that the molecule now has a slightly positive "top" and a slightly negative "bottom", and so is overall a polar molecule. The distance of the electrons from the nucleus remains relatively constant in a periodic table row, but not in a periodic table column.
In this expression, Q represents a charge, k represents a constant and r is the distance between the charges. It is readily seen from these numbers that, as the distance between the charges increases, the force decreases very rapidly. This is called a quadratic change. The result of this change is that electronegativity increases from bottom to top in a column in the periodic table even though there are more protons in the elements at the bottom of the column.
Elements at the top of a column have greater electronegativities than elements at the bottom of a given column. The overall trend for electronegativity in the periodic table is diagonal from the lower left corner to the upper right corner. Since the electronegativity of some of the important elements cannot be determined by these trends they lie in the wrong diagonal , we have to memorize the following order of electronegativity for some of these common elements.
The most electronegative element is fluorine. If you remember that fact, everything becomes easy, because electronegativity must always increase towards fluorine in the Periodic Table.
Note: This simplification ignores the noble gases. Historically this is because they were believed not to form bonds - and if they do not form bonds, they cannot have an electronegativity value. Even now that we know that some of them do form bonds, data sources still do not quote electronegativity values for them.
The positively charged protons in the nucleus attract the negatively charged electrons. As the number of protons in the nucleus increases, the electronegativity or attraction will increase. Therefore electronegativity increases from left to right in a row in the periodic table.
This effect only holds true for a row in the periodic table because the attraction between charges falls off rapidly with distance.
The chart shows electronegativities from sodium to chlorine ignoring argon since it does not does not form bonds. As you go down a group, electronegativity decreases. If it increases up to fluorine, it must decrease as you go down. The chart shows the patterns of electronegativity in Groups 1 and 7.
Consider sodium at the beginning of period 3 and chlorine at the end ignoring the noble gas, argon. Think of sodium chloride as if it were covalently bonded. Both sodium and chlorine have their bonding electrons in the 3-level. The electron pair is screened from both nuclei by the 1s, 2s and 2p electrons, but the chlorine nucleus has 6 more protons in it.
It is no wonder the electron pair gets dragged so far towards the chlorine that ions are formed. Electronegativity increases across a period because the number of charges on the nucleus increases. That attracts the bonding pair of electrons more strongly. As you go down a group, electronegativity decreases because the bonding pair of electrons is increasingly distant from the attraction of the nucleus. Consider the hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride molecules:.
The bonding pair is shielded from the fluorine's nucleus only by the 1s 2 electrons. In the chlorine case it is shielded by all the 1s 2 2s 2 2p 6 electrons. But fluorine has the bonding pair in the 2-level rather than the 3-level as it is in chlorine. If it is closer to the nucleus, the attraction is greater.
At the beginning of periods 2 and 3 of the Periodic Table, there are several cases where an element at the top of one group has some similarities with an element in the next group.
Whether it is their personality, attractiveness, or athletic skills—something pulls people toward them, while others have a smaller group of friends and acquaintances.
Atoms do the same thing. Valence electrons of both atoms are always involved when those two atoms come together to form a chemical bond. Chemical bonds are the basis for how elements combine with one another to form compounds.
When these chemical bonds form, atoms of some elements have a greater ability to attract the valence electrons involved in the bond than other elements. Electronegativity is a measure of the ability of an atom to attract the electrons when the atom is part of a compound. Electronegativity differs from electron affinity because electron affinity is the actual energy released when an atom gains an electron. Electronegativity is not measured in energy units, but is rather a relative scale.
All elements are compared to one another, with the most electronegative element, fluorine, being assigned an electronegativity value of 3. Fluorine attracts electrons better than any other element. The table below shows the electronegativity values for the elements.
Figure 1. The largest electronegativity 3. Since metals have few valence electrons, they tend to increase their stability by losing electrons to become cations. Consequently, the electronegativities of metals are generally low.
Nonmetals have more valence electrons and increase their stability by gaining electrons to become anions.
The electronegativities of nonmetals are generally high. Electronegativities generally increase from left to right across a period. This is due to an increase in nuclear charge.
Alkali metals have the lowest electronegativities, while halogens have the highest. Because most noble gases do not form compounds, they do not have electronegativities.
Note that there is little variation among the transition metals. Electronegativities generally decrease from top to bottom within a group due to the larger atomic size. This indicates that fluorine has a high tendency to gain electrons from other elements with lower electronegativities.
We can use these values to predict what happens when certain elements combine.
0コメント